How to Score Leads Against Your ICP
A written ICP is only useful if it changes what your team does with an actual list of leads. That's what a scoring model is for — turning "does this company fit?" into a number sales can act on without a debate every time.
Why scoring beats a gut check
Without a score, every lead gets an ad hoc judgment call, which means two reps treat the same lead completely differently. A scoring model forces the criteria that matter into the open and makes prioritization consistent.
A simple 100-point starting model
Firmographic fit — industry, size, geography match your ICP: up to 30 points
Trigger event present — something changed that makes them ready now: up to 30 points
Buying signal — they requested a demo, downloaded a template, replied to outreach: up to 25 points
Budget confirmed or strongly implied: up to 15 points
Turning the score into action
70+: A-tier — sales works these first, same-day follow-up
40–69: B-tier — nurture with content, revisit after another trigger
Under 40: C-tier — deprioritize or route to self-serve content
Where the points should come from
Don't invent the weights in a whiteboard session — pull them from your actual best customers (see how to validate an ICP with real interviews). The traits that show up most often in your fastest-closing, longest-retained accounts are the ones that deserve the most points. If you don't have that data yet, weight toward trigger event and buying signal — behavior predicts better than firmographics alone, especially early on.
And just as important as who scores high: know who should score close to zero. That's covered in our guide to building a negative ICP.
Comments